TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
BUFRFT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs$37.40―0.95%11.04B
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF$34.97―0.69%3.48B
SFLRInnovator Equity Managed Floor ETF$38.75$47.59(22.80% Upside)0.89%2.27B
BUFDFT Cboe Vest Fund of Deep Buffer ETF$30.37―0.95%2.23B
BUFQFT Cboe Vest Fund of Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETFs$39.24―1.00%1.71B
FJANFT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January$56.42―0.85%1.50B
FMAYFT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May$57.05―0.85%1.49B
SALISchroders US Autocallable Ladder Income ETF$24.46―0.65%60.12M
IACLGraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF$24.83―0.55%4.24M
LBOXGraniteShares Short Term Box ETF$25.23―0.13%2.77M

Performance Comparison

-5%0%5%10%15%Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
BUFRFT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs37.403.6210.72%
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF34.971.945.87%
SFLRInnovator Equity Managed Floor ETF38.751.945.26%
BUFDFT Cboe Vest Fund of Deep Buffer ETF30.372.508.97%
BUFQFT Cboe Vest Fund of Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETFs39.243.7810.66%
FJANFT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January56.425.7211.28%
FMAYFT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May57.054.408.36%
SALISchroders US Autocallable Ladder Income ETF24.46-0.20-0.79%
IACLGraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF24.830.100.41%
LBOXGraniteShares Short Term Box ETF25.230.210.82%

ETFs Similar to FBUF FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to FBUF?
Among the ETFs similar to FBUF, LBOX (GraniteShares Short Term Box ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.13% a year, compared with 0.48% for FBUF.
FBUF vs. BUFR: what is the difference?
BUFR (FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs) is the first ETF in FBUF's similar-ETF list. It has $11.04B in assets under management and a 0.95% expense ratio, against $27.73M and 0.48% for FBUF. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.