TipRanks
Advertisement

CSEN - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CSEN

Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
CSEN, the Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF, has a solid overall rating, reflecting a portfolio anchored by strong, cash-generative energy leaders like ConocoPhillips, Suncor Energy, and Exxon Mobil, which benefit from robust balance sheets, positive earnings calls, and strategic growth initiatives. Additional support comes from companies like Schlumberger and Devon Energy, which show strong technical momentum and operational performance, though some holdings face challenges such as high leverage, valuation concerns, and cash flow pressures, and the fund’s heavy focus on the energy sector means its performance is closely tied to energy prices and sector-specific risks.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered steady gains so far this year and over the past three months, showing positive momentum.
Top Holdings Showing Solid Gains
Many of the largest positions, including major energy companies, have posted strong year-to-date performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Focused Yet Diversified Energy Exposure
While centered on the energy theme, the fund spreads its assets across multiple energy-related companies and a few other sectors, reducing reliance on any single stock.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration in Energy
With most of the portfolio in the energy sector, the ETF is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Heavy Tilt Toward U.S. Market
The fund’s large allocation to U.S. companies means performance is closely tied to the U.S. economy and offers limited diversification across other regions.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The ETF’s management fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can modestly reduce investors’ net returns over time.

CSEN vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CSEN Summary

CSEN, the Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF, focuses on companies involved in today’s changing energy landscape rather than tracking a fixed index. It invests mainly in U.S. energy businesses, including well-known names like Exxon Mobil and Phillips 66, plus firms working on cleaner and more efficient energy systems. Someone might consider CSEN to gain targeted exposure to the long-term shift in how the world produces and uses energy, with a mix of income and growth potential. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, so its value can swing more than a broad market fund.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.80%, which means you’ll pay about $8 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed, with professionals picking energy-related investments rather than simply tracking a passive index.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if global efforts to transition to cleaner energy accelerate, boosting demand for both traditional energy companies that adapt, like Exxon Mobil and Valero, and renewable or grid-focused firms such as First Solar, as well as from stable cash flows in energy infrastructure around the world. On the downside, it may be hurt by falling energy prices, slower progress on climate and energy policies, higher interest rates that pressure income-focused and infrastructure stocks, or stricter environmental rules that raise costs for its traditional oil and gas holdings.

CSEN Top 10 Holdings

CSEN is leaning heavily on traditional energy giants, with refiners like Phillips 66 and Valero setting the pace as they continue to rise and power the fund’s recent gains. Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips are more of a steady engine—solid over the longer run but lately losing a bit of steam. On the flip side, First Solar has been lagging, acting as a small brake on this energy-transition story. Overall, the ETF is tightly focused on the global energy patch, tilting more toward fossil-fuel players than pure-play renewables.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Exxon Mobil9.15%$14.72M$694.67B52.57%
74
Outperform
Phillips 669.00%$14.47M$111.00B119.45%
73
Outperform
Conocophillips7.31%$11.75M$161.10B53.01%
78
Outperform
Suncor Energy7.24%$11.64M$84.55B82.91%
77
Outperform
SLB6.16%$9.91M$72.65B54.32%
75
Outperform
Williams Co5.94%$9.55M$88.89B16.07%
76
Outperform
Devon Energy4.23%$6.81M$53.09B48.49%
79
Outperform
Nextpower Inc3.34%$5.38M$13.07B4.00%
78
Outperform
Energy Transfer3.21%$5.16M$70.28B25.29%
70
Outperform
First Solar3.20%$5.15M$19.11B-21.29%
75
Outperform

CSEN Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
25.54
Positive
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.07
Negative
RSI
60.29
Neutral
STOCH
96.28
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CSEN, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.51, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.54, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.07 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.29 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 96.28 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CSEN.

CSEN Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$161.24M0.80%
68
Neutral
――$846.28M0.17%
66
Neutral
――$741.62M0.75%
70
Neutral
――$566.21M0.95%
67
Neutral
――$509.92M0.63%
64
Neutral
――$472.49M0.45%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CSEN
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF
26.09
1.92
7.94%
AVRE
Avantis Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
―
―
―
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
―
―
―
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
―
―
―
VGSR
Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement