ETFs Similar to CGW
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Change | Price Target | Smart Score | Expense Ratio | Asset Under Management | Follow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBRFirst Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | $101.03 | $117.52(16.32% Upside) | 0.58% | 18.22B | |||
| PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | $53.52 | $65.64(22.64% Upside) | 0.47% | 14.11B | |||
| BAIiShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | $39.25 | $56.81(44.74% Upside) | 0.55% | 13.16B | |||
| GRIDFirst Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | $164.51 | $209.50(27.35% Upside) | 0.56% | 11.53B | |||
| PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF | $73.76 | $84.19(14.14% Upside) | 0.59% | 2.06B | |||
| FIWFirst Trust Water ETF | $112.24 | $129.64(15.50% Upside) | 0.50% | 1.83B | |||
| PIOInvesco Global Water ETF | $43.89 | $50.19(14.36% Upside) | 0.75% | 269.74M | |||
| AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF | $18.61 | $20.69(11.21% Upside) | 0.50% | 21.14M |
International Listings
OTC and non-US listings of funds similar to CGW.
Performance Comparison
| Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 101.03 | 24.14 | 31.40% | |
| PAVE | Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | 53.52 | 5.81 | 12.17% | |
| BAI | iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | 39.25 | 2.41 | 6.54% | |
| GRID | First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 164.51 | 8.33 | 5.34% | |
| PHO | Invesco Water Resources ETF | 73.76 | 3.05 | 4.31% | |
| FIW | First Trust Water ETF | 112.24 | 1.71 | 1.55% | |
| PIO | Invesco Global Water ETF | 43.88 | -0.54 | -1.22% | |
| AQWA | Global X Clean Water ETF | 18.61 | -0.51 | -2.69% |
ETFs Similar to CGW FAQ
What is the cheapest alternative to CGW?
Among the ETFs similar to CGW, PAVE (Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.47% a year, compared with 0.58% for CGW.
CGW vs. CIBR: what is the difference?
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is the first ETF in CGW's similar-ETF list. It has $18.22B in assets under management and a 0.58% expense ratio, against $1.04B and 0.58% for CGW. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.
How is CGW different from PHO?
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) comes from the same fund family as CGW (Invesco). PHO charges 0.59% a year, against 0.58% for CGW. PHO manages $2.06B in assets, against $1.04B for CGW. Both funds are in the comparison table above.