TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
USOUnited States Oil Fund LP$168.83―0.60%1.91B
WEATTeucrium Wheat Fund$22.20―2.80%233.90M
BWETBreakwave Tanker Shipping ETF$968.92―3.50%178.45M
CORNTeucrium Corn Fund$17.34―2.71%107.88M
USOYDefiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF$7.89―1.12%81.06M
USLUnited States 12 Month Oil Fund LP$64.42―0.85%51.32M
SOYBTeucrium Soybean Fund$26.14―2.73%39.23M
ISTMiShares Strategic Metals ETF$27.49―0.47%25.42M
SCOProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil$15.65―0.95%879.16M
UCOProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil$67.17―1.43%493.97M

Performance Comparison

0%2000%4000%Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
USOUnited States Oil Fund LP168.8396.09132.10%
WEATTeucrium Wheat Fund22.200.552.54%
BWETBreakwave Tanker Shipping ETF968.92950.925282.89%
CORNTeucrium Corn Fund17.34-0.63-3.51%
USOYDefiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF7.893.4979.48%
USLUnited States 12 Month Oil Fund LP64.4229.3983.90%
SOYBTeucrium Soybean Fund26.142.6711.38%
ISTMiShares Strategic Metals ETF27.483.4014.13%
SCOProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil15.65-55.79-78.09%
UCOProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil67.1745.50209.97%

ETFs Similar to CANE FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to CANE?
Among the ETFs similar to CANE, ISTM (iShares Strategic Metals ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.47% a year, compared with 2.80% for CANE.
CANE vs. USO: what is the difference?
USO (United States Oil Fund LP) is the first ETF in CANE's similar-ETF list. It has $1.91B in assets under management and a 0.60% expense ratio, against $59.03M and 2.80% for CANE. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.
How is CANE different from WEAT?
WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) comes from the same fund family as CANE (Teucrium). WEAT charges 2.80% a year, against 2.80% for CANE. WEAT manages $233.90M in assets, against $59.03M for CANE. Both funds are in the comparison table above.