TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
PBPHPortfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF$31.16$33.11(6.25% Upside)0.13%1.21B
IBBQInvesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF$35.60$45.88(28.88% Upside)0.19%122.25M
LFSCF/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF$43.27$67.40(55.77% Upside)0.54%125.43M
HRTSTema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF$38.77$45.71(17.92% Upside)0.75%57.10M
OZEMRoundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF$30.57$48.54(58.76% Upside)0.59%55.57M
PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF$19.08$54.73(186.85% Upside)1.00%45.42M
IBRNiShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF$32.52$54.18(66.62% Upside)0.47%6.56M
THNRAmplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF$25.92$35.84(38.26% Upside)0.59%5.83M
PEPTREX Peptide ETF$26.92$37.73(40.17% Upside)0.65%1.88M
BIBProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology$117.10―0.95%103.75M

Performance Comparison

0%20%40%60%80%Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26Nov '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
PBPHPortfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF31.166.1124.38%
IBBQInvesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF35.609.5436.62%
LFSCF/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF43.2710.9834.02%
HRTSTema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF38.776.8521.47%
OZEMRoundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF30.571.906.61%
PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF19.081.8510.76%
IBRNiShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF32.523.2010.91%
THNRAmplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF25.923.0713.41%
PEPTREX Peptide ETF26.921.877.44%
BIBProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology117.1047.6268.53%

ETFs Similar to CANC FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to CANC?
Among the ETFs similar to CANC, PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.13% a year, compared with 0.75% for CANC.
CANC vs. PBPH: what is the difference?
PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) is the first ETF in CANC's similar-ETF list. It has $1.21B in assets under management and a 0.13% expense ratio, against $216.18M and 0.75% for CANC. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.
How is CANC different from HRTS?
HRTS (Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF) comes from the same fund family as CANC (Tema). HRTS charges 0.75% a year, against 0.75% for CANC. HRTS manages $57.10M in assets, against $216.18M for CANC. Both funds are in the comparison table above.